Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 4 Proportion of households with dengue cases, rate of dengue occurrence and mean number of work/school days lost in intervention and control clusters in last 12Ìýmonths

From: Household costs of dengue illness: secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of dengue prevention in Guerrero state, Mexico

Ìý

Intervention

Control

Significance of difference

Households with dengue cases

6.1% (326/5349)

7.9% (407/5141)

pÌý=Ìý0.091

Dengue case rate in trial populations

19.8/1000

27.1/1000

Ìý

Mean number of work/school days lost by the dengue patients

9.1 (SD 7.88)

8.4 (SD 7.31)

pÌý=Ìý0.222

Days lost by dengue cases /1000 population

180.18

227.64

Ìý

Mean number of work/school days lost by caregivers of dengue patients

9.08 (SD 8.13)

8.26 (SD 7.46)

pÌý=Ìý0.122

Days lost by caregivers /1000 population

179.78

223.85

Ìý
  1. 1Cluster t-test. Mean differenceÌý−Ìý0.018, 95% CIca −0.040 - 0.004, tÌý=Ìý−1.685,dfÌý=Ìý88
  2. 2Unpaired t-test
  3. Extrapolation of days saved by the intervention:
  4. Saving in days lost by sick people per thousand populationÌý=Ìý227.64–180.18Ìý=Ìý47.46 /1000
  5. Saving in days lost by caregivers per thousand populationÌý=Ìý223.85–179.78Ìý=Ìý44.07 /1000
  6. Total savings in days lost per thousand populationÌý=Ìý47.46Ìý+Ìý44.07Ìý=Ìý91.53 /1000Ìý=Ìý0.09153