樱花视频

Skip to main content

Table 2 Tertiles of cardiorespiratory fitness across components of physical literacy for 8-year-old boys and girls

From: Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with physical literacy in a large sample of Canadian children aged 8 to 12听years

20mSRT (# laps)

Boys (n鈥�=鈥�522)

Girls (n鈥�=鈥�524)

low CRF

medium CRF

high CRF

Cohen鈥檚 d

low CRF

medium CRF

high CRF

Cohen鈥檚 d

9.4 (2.7)

19.5 (3.6)

39.5 (11.2)

听

9.5 (2.1)

15.9 (1.9)

31.1 (10.6)

听

Physical Literacy

鈥僒otal CAPL score

55.1 (10.8)

62.1 (10.3)a

67.7 (9.8)b,c*

1.22

58.7 (9.9)

62.7 (9.9)a

67.1 (8.3)b,c*

0.92

Physical Competence domain

鈥僒otal domain score

17.5 (3.4)

20.0 (3.2)a

22.4 (3.0)b,c*

1.53

17.4 (3.8)

19.8 (3.2)a

21.3 (3.2)b,c*

1.11

鈥僅andgrip score (kg)

25.5 (6.8)

26.8 (5.6)

29.3 (5.6)b,c*

0.61

24.5 (5.9)

24.9 (5.4)

26.8 (5.3)b,c*

0.41

鈥働rone plank score (sec)

37.6 (27.2)

51.9 (34.5)a

72.0 (41.5)b,c*

0.98

39.3 (21.6)

54.9 (37.3)a

74.0 (50.6)b,c*

0.89

鈥僑it-and-reach score (cm)

26.1 (6.7)

27.1 (7.0)

28.1 (6.8)c*

0.30

29.8 (7.0)

32.0 (6.5)a

32.1 (7.5)c*

0.32

鈥僕aist circumference (cm)

63.2 (9.0)

60.8 (6.9)a

59.0 (4.4)b,c*

0.59

64.4 (9.8)

60.8 (7.7)a

59.2 (6.6)c*

0.62

鈥傿MI (kg/m2)

18.1 (3.4)

16.9 (2.3)a

16.6 (1.9)c*

0.55

18.3 (3.5)

16.9 (2.5)a

16.7 (2.5)c*

0.53

鈥僀AMSA score

23.7 (6.0)

28.5 (5.3)a

31.2 (5.1)b,c*

1.35

23.5 (5.7)

26.3 (5.7)a

28.9 (5.4)b,c*

0.97

Daily Behaviour domain

鈥僒otal domain score

16.3 (7.9)

19.3 (7.3)a

21.6 (6.9)b,c*

0.71

18.8 (7.4)

20.2 (7.1)

21.9 (6.4)c*

0.45

鈥傾verage daily step counts

11,369 (3786)

13,589 (3907)a

14,218 (3471)c*

0.78

11,270 (3479)

11,773 (3242)

11,758 (3283)

0.14

鈥僑elf-reported screen time (h/day)

3.2 (2.4)

2.4 (1.8)a

2.1 (2.0)c*

0.50

2.2 (2.0)

1.9 (1.8)

1.6 (1.5)c

0.34

鈥傾verage days/week meeting the guidelines

4.4 (2.3)

4.7 (2.4)

5.4 (1.9)b,c*

0.47

4.5 (2.3)

4.8 (2.1)

5.2 (1.8)c

0.34

Motivation and Confidence domain

鈥僒otal domain score

11.5 (2.8)

12.3 (2.5)a

13.2 (2.3)b,c*

0.66

12.0 (2.3)

11.9 (2.5)

13.2 (2.1)b,c*

0.54

鈥傿enefits and barriers

1.3 (1.4)

1.5 (1.3)

1.8 (1.2)c*

0.38

1.4 (1.2)

1.3 (1.2)

1.6 (1.1)c

0.17

鈥傾ctivity levels compared to peers

0.7 (0.3)

0.7 (0.2)

0.8 (0.2)c*

0.39

0.7 (0.2)

0.7 (0.2)

0.8 (0.2)b*

0.50

鈥僑kill level compared to peers

0.7 (0.3)

0.7 (0.3)

0.8 (0.2)b,c*

0.39

0.7 (0.2)

0.7 (0.2)

0.7 (0.2)

0.00

鈥僀SAPPA adequacy score

4.5 (0.9)

4.6 (0.8)

4.9 (0.8)b,c*

0.47

4.5 (0.9)

4.5 (0.8)

4.9 (0.8)b,c*

0.47

鈥僀SAPPA predilection score

4.3 (1.0)

4.8 (0.9)a

5.0 (0.9)c*

0.74

4.6 (0.9)

4.8 (0.9)

5.2 (0.7)b,c*

0.74

Knowledge and Understanding domain

鈥僒otal domain score

9.8 (2.7)

10.5 (3.0)

10.4 (2.6)

0.23

10.5 (2.5)

10.7 (2.6)

10.7 (2.6)

0.08

鈥僀APL questionnaire score

9.8 (2.7)

10.5 (3.0)

10.4 (2.6)

0.23

10.5 (2.5)

10.7 (2.6)

10.7 (2.6)

0.08

  1. Note: All variables are presented as means (卤SD). Statistical significance for the main effect was assessed using ANCOVA controlling for maturity offset. Bonferroni (Dunn) t-test was used to assess differences between groups. Cohen鈥檚 d was used to calculate the effect size between the low and high CRF groups
  2. 20mSRT 20-m shuttle run test, ANCOVA analysis of covariance, BMI body mass index, CAMSA Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment, CAPL Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy, CRF cardiorespiratory fitness, CSAPPA Children鈥檚 Self-Perception and Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity
  3. ap鈥�<鈥�0.05 for medium CRF vs low CRF
  4. bp鈥�<鈥�0.05 for high CRF vs medium CRF
  5. cp鈥�<鈥�0.05 for high CRF vs low CRF
  6. * p鈥�<鈥�0.001 for main effect
Back to article page

樱花视频

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us