Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression analyses for associations between physical literacy domains and physical activity guideline (PAG) adherence and sedentary behaviour guideline (SBG) adherence

From: The relationship between physical literacy scores and adherence to Canadian physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines

Ìý

B

SE

Z ratio

p

OR (95% CI)

PAG model

 I²Ô³Ù±ð°ù³¦±ð±è³Ù

−0.206

0.448

−0.46

0.6457

Ìý

 Physical Competence

0.726

0.104

6.99

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

2.1 (1.7, 2.5)

 Motivation and Confidence

0.218

0.105

2.07

0.0385

1.2 (1.0, 1.5)

 Knowledge and Understanding

−0.104

0.105

−0.99

0.3234

0.9 (0.7, 1.1)

â€Çã²µ±ð

−0.146

0.044

−3.29

0.0010

0.9 (0.8, 0.9)

 G±ð²Ô»å±ð°ù

−0.898

0.102

−8.83

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

0.4 (0.3, 0.5)

 Season when tested

 â¶ÄÇȱè°ù¾±²Ô²µ

0.492

0.146

3.38

0.0007

1.6 (1.2, 2.2)

 â¶ÄÇȳܳ¾³¾±ð°ù

0.538

0.196

2.74

0.0061

1.7 (1.2, 2.5)

 â¶ÄƒF²¹±ô±ô

0.262

0.153

1.72

0.0864

1.3 (1.0, 1.8)

SBG model

 I²Ô³Ù±ð°ù³¦±ð±è³Ù

2.053

0.369

5.57

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

Ìý

 Physical Competence

0.389

0.086

4.51

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

1.5 (1.2, 1.7)

 Motivation and Confidence

0.729

0.089

8.22

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

2.1 (1.7, 2.5)

 Knowledge and Understanding

−0.093

0.084

−1.11

0.2680

0.9 (0.8, 1.1)

â€Çã²µ±ð

−0.239

0.036

−6.58

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

0.8 (0.7, 0.8)

 G±ð²Ô»å±ð°ù

0.509

0.081

6.25

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

1.7 (1.4, 2.0)

 Season when tested

 â¶ÄÇȱè°ù¾±²Ô²µ

−0.038

0.111

−â¶Ä‰0.34

0.7330

1.0 (0.8, 1.2)

 â¶ÄÇȳܳ¾³¾±ð°ù

0.164

0.157

1.04

0.2970

1.2 (0.9, 1.6)

 â¶ÄƒF²¹±ô±ô

0.031

0.118

0.26

0.7940

1.0 (0.8, 1.3)

  1. Reference categories for the physical literacy domains (physical competence, motivation and confidence, knowledge and understanding), gender and season when tested are for those not meeting the recommended levels, boys, and winter, respectively
  2. McFadden R2 values for the PAG and SBG models are 0.15 and 0.12, respectively
  3. Domain scores (physical competence, motivation and confidence, knowledge and understanding) were analyzed as meeting the minimum recommended level as defined by the CAPL