Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy

Table 1 Model fit statistics for different questionnaires to assess motivation and confidence constructs

听	Chi-square	Df	P	CFI	RMSEA	RMSEA 90% CI	位 range
Adequacy and predilection (original)	291.99	103	&濒迟;鈥�0.001	0.744	0.095	0.082, 0.107	0.301鈥�0.698
Adequacy and predilection (revised)	29.21	32	0.609	1.0	0.00	0.000, 0.046	0.531鈥�0.836
Benefits and barriers (original)	230.06	151	&濒迟;鈥�0.001	0.894	0.051	0.037, 0.063	0.359鈥�0.768
Benefits and barriers (revised)	189.20	150	0.017	0.948	0.036	0.016, 0.051	0.349鈥�0.783
Perceived competence (original)	6.87	9	0.650	1.0	0.000	0.000, 0.064	0.115鈥�0.765
Perceived competence (revised)	2.94	5	0.710	1.0	0.000	0.000, 0.072	0.475鈥�0.767
Motivation	92.16	48	< 0.001	0.907	0.067	0.046, 0.087	0.427鈥�0.859

Note. Adequacy and predilection original鈥�=鈥塷riginal CAPL model with 16 items. Adequacy and predilection (revised)鈥�=鈥塺educed model based on EFA results with 10 items and 3 subscales representing adequacy, predilection, and behaviour. Benefits and barriers (original)鈥�=鈥塷riginal model with 19 items. Benefits and barriers (revised)鈥�=鈥塺evised model with a correlated error. Perceived competence (original)鈥�=鈥塸erceived competence with 6 items. Perceived competence (revised)鈥�=鈥塸erceived competence excluding the reverse coded item. Motivation鈥�=鈥塱ntrinsic, identified, introjected, and extrinsic regulation subscales
CFI comparative fit index, CI 90% confidence interval, Df degrees of freedom, EFA exploratory factor analysis, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, 位 standardized factor loading

ISSN: 1471-2458