樱花视频

Skip to main content

Table 5 Covariates associated with smokeless tobacco use in Kenya

From: Tobacco use and its determinants in the 2015 Kenya WHO STEPS survey

Smokeless tobacco use

Crude Odds Ratioa

Adjusted Odds Ratioa

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Sex

鈥僃别尘补濒别

1.00

1.00

鈥僊补濒别

1.23 (0.90, 1.69)

0.189

1.51 (0.95, 2.41)

0.079

Age group

鈥18鈥29

1.00

1.00

鈥30鈥39

1.11 (0.71, 1.74)

0.635

0.94 (0.47, 1.87)

0.854

鈥40鈥49

1.38 (0.85, 2.22)

0.190

2.04 (1.01, 4.11)

0.047

鈥50鈥59

2.53 (1.59, 4.01)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

1.99 (0.98, 4.03)

0.057

鈥60鈥69

3.54 (2.11, 5.94)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

1.1 (0.46, 2.66)

0.826

Education level

鈥僋辞 formal education

1.00

1.00

鈥働rimary complete

0.13 (0.09, 0.19)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.12 (0.06, 0.22)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

鈥侨别肠辞苍诲ary and above

0.09 (0.06, 0.13)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.01 (0, 0.09)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

Residence

鈥僓谤产补苍

1.00

1.00

鈥僐耻谤补濒

2.55 (1.73, 3.77)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

1.38 (0.76, 2.52)

0.292

Occupation

鈥僓苍别尘辫濒辞测别诲

1.00

1.00

鈥僂尘辫濒辞测别诲

0.47 (0.34, 0.64)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.58 (0.39, 0.88)

0.009

Ever used alcohol

鈥僋辞

1.00

1.00

鈥僘别蝉

2.49 (1.79, 3.45)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

2.58 (1.47, 4.54)

0.001

Episodic alcohol drinking

鈥僋辞 alcohol

1.00

1.00

鈥傿inge drinking

5.19 (3.75, 7.19)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

4.84 (1.55, 15.15)

0.007

鈥僋辞n-heavy drinking

1.04 (0.42, 2.55)

0.932

3.52 (0.22, 57.21)

0.377

Wealth band

鈥働辞辞谤别蝉迟

1.00

1.00

鈥侨别肠辞苍诲

0.31 (0.21, 0.48)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.44 (0.22, 0.91)

0.026

鈥僊颈诲诲濒别

0.21 (0.13, 0.35)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.56 (0.28, 1.15)

0.117

鈥僃辞耻谤迟丑

0.09 (0.04, 0.18)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.04 (0, 0.57)

0.017

鈥僐颈肠丑别蝉迟

0.19 (0.11, 0.3)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

0.16 (0.02, 1.08)

0.060

Marital status

鈥僋辞t married

1.00

1.00

鈥僊补谤谤颈别诲

1.73 (1.07, 2.82)

0.026

1.21 (0.67, 2.2)

0.522

鈥僃ormerly married

4.96 (2.9, 8.48)

&濒迟;鈥0.001

2.48 (1.27, 4.83)

0.007

  1. Key: aAll sociodemographic variables (except occupation) were included in final regression models if found to be statistically significant. This was true except for occupation given the original coding of the variable in the survey that was not felt to be meaningful for our study. The variable sex was maintained in the three models, even though it was only found to have a statistically significant relationship with daily tobacco use given the hypothesized importance of the role of sex on tobacco use