Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Impact of the multimodal exercise programs in selective and sustained attention variables

From: Can two multimodal psychomotor exercise programs improve attention, affordance perception, and balance in community dwellings at risk of falling? A randomized controlled trial

Ìý

Baseline (A)

(²Ñ±ð²¹²Ô ±â¶Ä‰S¶Ù)

Post-intervention (B)

(²Ñ±ð²¹²Ô ±â¶Ä‰S¶Ù)

Follow-up (C)

(²Ñ±ð²¹²Ô ±â¶Ä‰S¶Ù)

P-valuea

Pairwise Comparison

Selective and sustained attention

 Items processed (n)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

254.8 ±â¶Ä‰68.0

292.3 ±â¶Ä‰86.9

288.8 ±â¶Ä‰82.9

0.009

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

265.1 ±â¶Ä‰78.2

303.3 ±â¶Ä‰82.8

300.4 ±â¶Ä‰91.5

0.001

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

244.8 ±â¶Ä‰75.5

250.0 ±â¶Ä‰81.2

249.9 ±â¶Ä‰78.1

0.854

–

P-valueb

0.855

0.204

0.210

ÌýÌý

 Items recognized correctly (n)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

96.6 ±â¶Ä‰27.2

110.0 ±â¶Ä‰37.3

108.9 ±â¶Ä‰35.5

0.047

–

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

101.8 ±â¶Ä‰36.2

120.4 ±â¶Ä‰33.9

118.8 ±â¶Ä‰36.9

<  0.001

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

95.5 ±â¶Ä‰34.8

95.0 ±â¶Ä‰39.8

99.8 ±â¶Ä‰36.2

0.076

–

P-valueb

0.893

0.160

0.295

ÌýÌý

 Total efficacy (n)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

236.3 ±â¶Ä‰70.3

276.9 ±â¶Ä‰90.5

272.2 ±â¶Ä‰85.7

0.003

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

251.2 ±â¶Ä‰81.2

292.2 ±â¶Ä‰84.3

286.4 ±â¶Ä‰92.1

<  0.001

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

227.3 ±â¶Ä‰73.9

228.6 ±â¶Ä‰84.9

234.3 ±â¶Ä‰80.2

0.076

–

P-valueb

0.801

0.136

0.312

ÌýÌý

 Concentration index (n)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

90.0 ±â¶Ä‰32.1

105.9 ±â¶Ä‰40.6

103.0 ±â¶Ä‰38.0

0.002

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

97.8 ±â¶Ä‰38.2

116.3 ±â¶Ä‰36.3

115.8 ±â¶Ä‰39.3

<  0.001

A < B, C

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

89.9 ±â¶Ä‰38.1

88.3 ±â¶Ä‰44.7

96.1 ±â¶Ä‰39.1

0.141

–

P-valueb

0.858

0.143

0.293

ÌýÌý

 Fluctuation rate (n)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

11.1 ±â¶Ä‰2.6

12.6 ±â¶Ä‰3.3

11.1 ±â¶Ä‰3.5

0.207

–

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

12.7 ±â¶Ä‰6.0

10.3 ±â¶Ä‰2.6

10.4 ±â¶Ä‰3.1

0.637

–

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

12.9 ±â¶Ä‰4.9

11.8 ±â¶Ä‰4.6

10.2 ±â¶Ä‰3.2

0.047

–

P-valueb

0.262

0.182

0.575

ÌýÌý

 Percentage of errors (%)

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò1

7.8 ±â¶Ä‰6.9

6.2 ±â¶Ä‰5.6

6.6 ±â¶Ä‰5.5

0.895

–

 â¶ÄƒE³Ò2

6.0 ±â¶Ä‰5.3

4.2 ±â¶Ä‰3.8

5.3 ±â¶Ä‰5.8

0.611

–

 â¶ÄƒC³Ò

7.7 ±â¶Ä‰6.0

10.4 ±â¶Ä‰9.3

7.6 ±â¶Ä‰7.3

0.141

–

P-valueb

0.549

0.068

0.423

ÌýÌý
  1. SD standard deviation, EG1 experimental group attending the multimodal psychomotor program (n = 16), EG2 experimental group attending the combined program: multimodal psychomotor program + WBV (n = 16), CG control group (n = 19)
  2. awithin-group comparisons
  3. bbetween-group comparisons
  4. <: significant differences within groups, p &±ô³Ù; 0.05