Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment checklist of quantitative studies

From: Compliance with the 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines among children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Criteria

Yes

Partial

No

N/A

1. Question or objective sufficiently described?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

2. Design evident and appropriate to answer study question?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

3. Method of subject selection (and comparison group selection, if applicable) or source of information/input variables (e.g., for decision analysis) is described and appropriate.

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

4. Subject (and comparison group, if applicable) characteristics or input variables/information (e.g., for decision analyses) sufficiently described?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

5. If random allocation to treatment group was possible, is it described?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

6. If interventional and blinding of investigators to intervention was possible, is it reported?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

7. If interventional and blinding of subjects to intervention was possible, is it reported?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

8. Outcome and (if applicable) exposure measure(s) well defined and robust to measurement / misclassification bias? Means of assessment reported?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

9. Sample size appropriate?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

10. Analysis described and appropriate?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

11. Some estimate of variance (e.g., confidence intervals, standard errors) is reported for the main results/outcomes (i.e., those directly addressing the study question/objective upon which the conclusions are based)?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

12. Controlled for confounding?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

13. Results reported in sufficient detail?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

14. Do the results support the conclusions?

ÌýÌýÌýÌý