Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 6 Sensitivity analyses assessing the impact of exposure-mediator interaction on casual mediation analyses’ parameter estimates

From: Effects of intimate partner violence and homophobic bullying on ART adherence among young Thai men who have sex with men: a causal mediation analysis

Ìý

AORa

95% CI

P value

Intimate partner violence

 Intimate partner violence → Depression

1.83

1.11, 3.06

0.02

 Depression → ART nonadherence

1.91

1.05, 3.54

0.04

 Depression * Intimate partner violence → ART nonadherence

1.20

0.25, 6.80

0.83

 Total effect

1.11

1.02, 1.22

0.01

 Direct effect (not through depression, path A)

1.10

1.01, 1.22

0.03

 Average causal mediation effect (through depression, path B)

1.01

0.99, 1.03

0.23

 % Mediated

7.1%

−4%, 38%

0.24

Homophobic bullying

 Homophobic bullying → Depression

3.17

2.09, 4.93

 &±ô³Ù; 0.001

 Depression → ART nonadherence

1.82

0.96, 3.50

0.07

 Depression * homophobic bullying → ART nonadherence

0.93

0.25, 4.07

0.92

 Total effect

1.08

1.02, 1.16

0.006

 Direct effect (not through depression, path A)

1.07

1.01, 1.16

0.02

 Average causal mediation effect (through depression, path B)

1.01

0.99, 1.03

0.21

 % Mediated

15.6%

−11.9%, 59%

0.21

  1. Bolded = significant at p &±ô³Ù; 0.05
  2. aModels adjusted for age, education, income, regular partner status and ever provided sex work