Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 5 Mechanism analysis: eating style

From: Does income have a non-linear impact on residents’ BMI? Re-examining the obesity Kuznets curve

Ìý

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Processed food

Meat

Seafood

Pickled food

Dining out

IVProbit

IVProbit

IVProbit

IVProbit

2SLS

Income

0.660***

1.534***

1.433***

0.695***

0.115***

(0.206)

(0.089)

(0.115)

(0.200)

(0.032)

Income_sq

-0.108***

-0.195***

-0.204***

-0.113***

-0.012***

(0.038)

(0.027)

(0.018)

(0.037)

(0.004)

Controls

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Year FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Provincial FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Constant

-0.101

-0.728***

-0.707***

-0.454**

0.127***

(0.278)

(0.331)

(0.339)

(0.274)

(0.050)

Observations

42,444

42,444

42,444

42,444

81,529

  1. Note: The results in columns (1)–(4) are based on Probit instrumental variable method, whereas that in column (5) is based on 2SLS estimation. Standard errors clustered at the household level are reported in parentheses. ***, and ** indicate significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively