Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 3 Overall and city-specific perceived-environment scores

From: Perceived neighborhood built environment and physical activity in urban population in Chile

Ìý

Overall

Antofagasta

³Õ²¹±ô±è²¹°ù²¹Ã­²õ´Ç

Metropolitan

Maule

µþ¾±´Ç²úí´Ç

´¡°ù²¹³Ü³¦²¹²Ôí²¹

Los Lagos

Sample size

770

28

101

382

45

118

56

40

Land use mix-diversity1 (score 1–5)

2.6 (0.6)

2.3 (0.3)

2.2 (0.4)

2.7 (0.5)

2.5 (0.8)

2.6 (0.5)

2.8 (0.9)

2.6 (0.6)

Land use mix-access (score 1–4)

3.2 (0.4)

2.8 (0.4)

3.1 (0.4)

3.2 (0.4)

3.0 (0.8)

3.5 (0.3)

2.9 (0.5)

2.8 (0.4)

Street connectivity2 (score 1–4)

2.9 (0.7)

2.6 (0.5)

2.7 (0.8)

3.0 (0.6)

2.6 (0.6)

3.3 (0.7)

2.8 (0.6)

2.9 (0.6)

Walking/cycling facilities (score 1–4)

3.2 (0.6)

2.9 (0.5)

3.3 (0.5)

3.3 (0.6)

3.1 (0.7)

3.3 (0.6)

3.3 (0.9)

3.0 (0.5)

Aesthetics (score 1–4)

2.9 (0.8)

1.9 (0.8)

3.1 (0.9)

2.9 (0.7)

3.0 (0.7)

2.8 (0.8)

2.8 (0.8)

2.8 (0.4)

Safety from traffic2 (score 1–4)

2.5 (0.5)

2.5 (0.2)

2.2 (0.8)

2.5 (0.4)

2.7 (0.4)

2.5 (0.6)

2.3 (0.4)

2.6 (0.3)

Safety from crime (score 1–4)

2.8 (0.6)

2.3 (0.5)

3.2 (0.7)

2.8 (0.6)

3.1 (0.5)

2.9 (0.6)

2.7 (0.5)

2.7 (0.5)

  1. Results presented as mean (standard deviation)
  2. 1 5-point scale: 5Ìýmin (1), 6–10Ìýmin (2), 11–20Ìýmin (3), 20–30Ìýmin (4), 30 + min (5)
  3. 2 4-point scale: strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), agree (3), strongly agree (4)