From: Perceived neighborhood built environment and physical activity in urban population in Chile
Ìý | Logistic Regression(1) Any transport-related PA (0 = < 600 MET/min/week, 1 ≥ 600/MET/min/week) | Linear Regression(2) Non-zero reported transport-related PA LOG10 (min/week) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent variables | OR (95%CI) | p | β (95%CI) | SE | p |
MEN | |||||
Land use mix-diversity (score 1–5) (3) | 1.16 (0.78–1.72) | 0.46 | -0.016 (-0.124-0.092) | 0.03 | 0.772 |
Land use mix-access (score 1–4) (3) | 0.81 (0.47–1.37) | 0.43 | 0.021 (-0.128-0.171) | 0.05 | 0.781 |
Street connectivity (4) | 0.97 (0.67–1.37) | 0.84 | -0.051 (-0.152-0.050) | 0.02 | 0.324 |
Walking/cycling facilities (score 1–4) (3) | 1.17 (0.80–1.72) | 0.41 | 0.089 (-0.018-0.195) | 0.05 | 0.101 |
Aesthetics (score 1–4) (3) | 1.11 (0.81–1.51) | 0.53 | 0.079 (-0.010-0.167) | 0.01 | 0.082 |
Safety from traffic (4) | 1.49 (0.97–2.30) | 0.07 | 0.088 (-0.033-0.209) | 0.02 | 0.153 |
Safety from crime (score 1–4) (3) | 0.91 (0.62–1.34) | 0.64 | 0.011 (-0.096-0.119) | 0.03 | 0.837 |
WOMEN | |||||
Land use mix-diversity (score 1–5) (3) | 1.32 (0.89–1.96) | 0.16 | -0.007 (-0.093-0.079) | 0.04 | 0.875 |
Land use mix-access (score 1–4) (3) | 0.82 (0.49–1.38) | 0.46 | -0.016 (-0.128-0.097) | 0.01 | 0.786 |
Street connectivity (4) | 0.79 (0.56–1.12) | 0.18 | -0.025 (-0.100-0.051) | 0.02 | 0.517 |
Walking/cycling facilities (score 1–4) (3) | 0.62 (0.42–0.92) | 0.02 | -0.085 (-0.170-0.001) | 0.03 | 0.051 |
Aesthetics (score 1–4) (3) | 0.89 (0.66–1.20) | 0.43 | 0.015 (-0.082-0.052) | 0.01 | 0.657 |
Safety from traffic (4) | 1.27 (0.82–1.98) | 0.29 | 0.098 (0.005–0.192) | 0.04 | 0.040 |
Safety from crime (score 1–4) (3) | 0.70 (0.47–1.04) | 0.07 | -0.012 (-0.100-0.075) | 0.02 | 0.782 |