Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 5 Regression models for leisure-related physical activity

From: Perceived neighborhood built environment and physical activity in urban population in Chile

Ìý

Logistic Regression(1)

Any leisure-related PA

(0 = < 600 MET/min/week, 1 ≥ 600/MET/min/week)

Linear Regression(2)

Non-zero reported leisure-related PA

LOG10 (min/week)

Ìý

Independent variables

OR (95%CI)

p

β (95%CI)

SE

p

Ìý

MEN

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Land use mix-diversity (score 1–5) (3)

1.22 (0.81–1.83)

0.34

-0.038 (-0.173-0.097)

0.02

0.578

Land use mix-access (score 1–4) (3)

Street connectivity (4)

1.72 (0.98–3.01)

0.85 (0.59–1.22)

0.06

0.38

0.104 (-0.093-0.301)

-0.150 (-0.266–0.034)

0.03

0.01

0.299

0.011

Walking/cycling facilities (score 1–4) (3)

0.75 (0.51–1.20)

0.16

-0.006 (-0.136-0.124)

0.03

0.929

Aesthetics (score 1–4) (3)

1.06 (0.76–1.46)

0.74

0.049 (-0.061-0.159)

0.02

0.377

Safety from traffic (4)

Safety from crime (score 1–4) (3)

1.22 (0.79–1.89)

0.82 (0.55–1.20)

0.38

0.31

0.004 (-0.142-0.150)

-0.042 (-0.181-0.097)

0.01

0.02

0.958

0.548

Ìý

WOMEN

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Land use mix-diversity (score 1–5) (3)

1.42 (1.00-2.03)

0.05

0.084 (-0.040-0.208)

0.03

0.185

Land use mix-access (score 1–4) (3)

Street connectivity (4)

0.94 (0.59–1.48)

0.85 (0.63–1.16)

0.78

0.31

-0.062 (-0.229-0.105)

-0.028 (-0.144-0.088)

0.04

0.03

0.467

0.636

Walking/cycling facilities (score 1–4) (3)

0.97 (0.69–1.37)

0.87

0.031 (-0.096-0.158)

0.02

0.634

Aesthetics (score 1–4) (3)

0.87 (0.67–1.14)

0.30

-0.026 (-0.124-0.073)

0.01

0.609

Safety from traffic (4)

Safety from crime (score 1–4) (3)

0.97 (0.66–1.43)

0.72 (0.51–1.02)

0.88

0.07

0.160 (0.012–0.309)

-0.041 (-0.166-0.084)

0.01

0.03

0.035

0.517

  1. OR: odds ratio; β: regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error
  2. (1) Logistic regression model with leisure-related physical activity for men (0=<600 MET/min/week, 1≥600/MET/min/week) as dependent variable, adjusted by age, BMI and education level
  3. (2) Linear regression model with transport-related physical activity time (LOG10 (min/week)) as dependent variable in participants with transport-related physical activity ≥10Ìýmin/week, adjusted by age, BMI and education level
  4. (3) higher scores indicate perception of higher land use mix-diversity, higher land use mix-access, more walking/cycling facilities, better aesthetics, and more safety from crime
  5. (4) 4-point scale: strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), agree (3), strongly agree (4)