Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics and outcomes for studies published during 2018–2022 (N = 9)

From: Effectiveness of naloxone distribution in community settings to reduce opioid overdose deaths among people who use drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (Year)**

Location

Population served

No. participants

Survivals*

Deaths*

Included in meta-analyses

Studies reporting individual-level data

Lintzeris (2020)

Australia

±Ê°Â±«¶Ù†

145

9

(100.0%)

0

(0.0%)

Yes

Buresh (2020)

Baltimore

PWUD

346

68

(95.8%)

3

(4.2%)

Yes

Jones (2022)

New York

PWUD

321

161

(97.0%)

5

(3.0%)

Yes

Troberg (2022)

Sweden

PWUD

165‡

123

(100.0%)

0

(0.0%)

Yes

Janssen (2020)

Michigan

Police

508

174

(94.6%)

10

(5.4%)

Yes

Williams (2021)

Canada

Community service providers

±·¸é§

1,517

(98.5%)

23

(1.5%)

No

Yang (2021)

United States

²Ñ¾±³æ±ð»å¶

3,609

335

(97.4%)

9

(2.6%)

No

Thylstrup (2019)

Denmark

Mixed#

552

23

(95.8%)

1

(4.2%)

No

Total

ÌýÌý

5,646

2,410

Ìý

51

ÌýÌý

Study reporting community-level data

Naumann (2019)

No. Carolina

Ìý

352 overdose deaths averted/3 years

No

  1. *Percentages are of events with known outcomes (survival or death). ** For full references, see Table S2. Articles included in systematic literature review on community-based naloxone distribution programs (2003–2022). †PWUD = People who use drugs. ‡Number of participants recruited from community-based locations. §NR = Not Reported. ¶Mixed = People who used drugs and other community members. #Mixed = People who used drugs, other community members, and law enforcement