Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Relationship between SSBs and constipation

From: The impact of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption on constipation: evidence from NHANES

Ìý

crude model

P value

Model 1

P value

Model 2

P value

Model 3

P value

SSBs-grams

ORs (95%CIs)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

 Quartile 1

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

 Quartile 2

1.109(0.812,1.516)

0.503

1.056(0.763,1.463)

0.731

0.996(0.722,1.374)

0.98

0.979(0.707,1.357)

0.898

 Quartile 3

1.485(1.102,2.002)

0.011

1.565(1.159,2.115)

0.005

1.484(1.114,1.977)

0.009

1.419(1.064,1.893)

0.019

 Quartile 4

1.465(1.144,1.875)

0.004

1.571(1.216,2.029)

0.001

1.538(1.083,2.184)

0.018

1.439(0.996,2.078)

0.052

P for trend

Ìý

0.001

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

0.207

Ìý

0.02

SSBs-kcal

ORs (95%CIs)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

 Quartile 1

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

 Quartile 2

1.035(0.728,1.470)

0.844

1.049(0.738,1.491)

0.78

1.121(0.786,1.598)

0.517

1.103(0.772,1.576)

0.581

 Quartile 3

1.390(1.039,1.860)

0.028

1.425(1.057,1.922)

0.022

1.341(0.978,1.839)

0.067

1.280(0.936,1.751)

0.117

 Quartile 4

1.684(1.301,2.181)

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

1.833(1.382,2.430)

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

1.691(1.214,2.355)

0.003

1.567(1.100,2.234)

0.015

P for trend

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

0.196

Ìý

0.016

  1. The crude model was not adjusted for any variables. Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, and race. Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, race, PIR, BMI, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, energy, sugar, moisture, fat, protein, physical activity levels, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. Model 3 was further adjusted for HEI-2015 scores based on Model 2. Abbreviations: ORs, odds ratios, CIs, confidence intervals; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages; PIR, the poverty-income ratio; BMI, body mass index; HEI-2015, Healthy Eating Index-2015