Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 3 The sensitivity analysis by excluding participants with extreme SSBs intake

From: The impact of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption on constipation: evidence from NHANES

Ìý

crude model

P value

Model 1

P value

Model 2

P value

Model 3

P value

SSBs-grams

ORs (95%CIs)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

 Quartile 1

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

 Quartile 2

1.121(0.811,1.549)

0.477

1.066(0.761,1.493)

0.699

1.003(0.719,1.399)

0.987

0.987(0.704,1.382)

0.936

 Quartile 3

1.491(1.102,2.016)

0.011

1.560(1.150,2.116)

0.006

1.477(1.103,1.977)

0.01

1.415(1.057,1.895)

0.021

 Quartile 4

1.437(1.098,1.879)

0.01

1.531(1.166,2.012)

0.004

1.484(1.038,2.121)

0.032

1.394(0.960,2.024)

0.079

P for trend

Ìý

0.003

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

0.225

Ìý

0.032

SSBs-kcal

ORs (95%CIs)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

 Quartile 1

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

ref

Ìý

 Quartile 2

0.975(0.678,1.402)

0.888

0.994(0.692,1.427)

0.972

1.091(0.750,1.586)

0.64

1.073(0.736,1.564)

0.707

 Quartile 3

1.485(1.083,2.034)

0.016

1.509(1.092,2.085)

0.015

1.388(1.001,1.924)

0.049

1.334(0.966,1.841)

0.079

 Quartile 4

1.621(1.234,2.128)

0.001

1.743(1.297,2.341)

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

1.572(1.107,2.234)

0.013

1.457(1.003,2.115)

0.048

P for trend

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

0.227

Ìý

0.036

  1. The crude model was not adjusted for any variables. Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, and race. Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, race, PIR, BMI, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, energy, sugar, moisture, fat, protein, physical activity levels, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. Model 3 was further adjusted for HEI-2015 scores based on Model 2. Abbreviations: ORs, odds ratios, CIs, confidence intervals; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages; PIR, the poverty-income ratio; BMI, body mass index; HEI-2015, Healthy Eating Index-2015