Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 3 ORs and 95% CIs for the associations between DOBS and MI in diabetic patients

From: Association between dietary oxidative balance scores and myocardial infarction in diabetic patients: insights from NHANES 1999–2018

DOBS

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

PSM Model

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Per score increase

0.97(0.96–0.99)

0.96(0.94–0.98)

0.97(0.95–0.99)

-

Per tertile increase

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Q1

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

Q2

0.72(0.54–0.97)

0.65(0.48–0.88)

0.69(0.50–0.93)

0.66(0.47–0.93)

Q3

0.64(0.50–0.84)

0.54(0.40–0.74)

0.62(0.43–0.87)

0.72(0.48–0.88)

  1. Model 1 is unadjusted. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity. Model 3 was further adjusted for education level, marital status, BMI, drinking, smoking, sedentary time, diabetes drugs, MI drugs, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and CKD. The PSM Model was based on separate 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching (caliper = 0.2) for Q2 vs. Q1 and Q3 vs. Q1, using the same covariates as Model 3. Abbreviations: DOBS = Dietary oxidative balance score, OR = Odds ratio, CI = Confidence interval