Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 5 ORs and 95% CIs for the associations between DOBS and MI in diabetic patients. (NHANES 1999–2004, NHANES 2005–2010, NHANES 2011–2018)

From: Association between dietary oxidative balance scores and myocardial infarction in diabetic patients: insights from NHANES 1999–2018

Cycles

DOBS

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

PSM Model

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

1999-

2004

Per score+

0.96(0.92–0.99)

0.94(0.88–0.99)0

0.95(0.89–0.98)

-

Per tertile+

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Q1

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

Q2

0.68(0.29–1.29)

0.59(0.18–1.18)

0.74(0.27–1.89)

0.80(0.15–1.15)

Q3

0.63(0.38–0.98)

0.50(0.19–0.97)

0.56(0.25–1.03)

0.67(0.21–0.97)

2005-

2010

Per score+

0.96(0.93–0.98)

0.94(0.91–0.97)

0.95(0.89–1.01)

-

Per tertile+

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Q1

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

Q2

0.60(0.39–0.91)

0.51(0.32–0.83)

0.55(0.34–0.89)

0.45(0.29–0.71)

Q3

0.53(0.34–0.82)

0.42(0.25–0.68)

0.52(0.31–0.87)

0.62(0.36–0.95)

2011-

2018

Per score+

0.98(0.96–0.99)

0.97(0.95–0.99)

0.98(0.95–1.01)

-

Per tertile+

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

Q1

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

1(Ref.)

Q2

0.81(0.53–0.92)

0.75(0.50–1.13)

0.80(0.52 − 0.11)

0.76(0.46–1.12)

Q3

0.71(0.48–0.95)

0.62(0.40–0.97)

0.67(0.42–0.98)

0.75(0.45–0.93)

  1. Model 1 is unadjusted. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity. Model 3 was further adjusted for education level, marital status, BMI, drinking, smoking, sedentary time, diabetes drugs, MI drugs, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and CKD. The PSM Model was based on separate 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching (caliper = 0.2) for Q2 vs. Q1 and Q3 vs. Q1, using the same covariates as Model 3. Abbreviations: DOBS = Dietary oxidative balance score, OR = Odds ratio, CI = Confidence interval. Per score+= Per score increase