Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention effect results on primary and secondary outcomes

From: ‘Saga Stories in health talks’ for health promotion in Swedish child healthcare: results from a cluster-randomised hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study

Ìý

Descriptive data follow-up

Complete cases analysis

Imputed data analysis

Ìý

Intervention n = 267

Control n = 289

Crude1

Adjusted2

Adjusted3 n = 698

Ìý

mean (SD)

mean (SD)

N

Coefficient (95% CI)

P

N

Coefficient (95% CI)

P

Coefficient (95% CI)

P

Primary outcome

 PSE total score4

121.6 (17.2)

124.3 (16.6)

556

−1.19 (−3.18 to 0.80)

0.23

554

−0.92 (−2.86 to 1.00)

0.35

−0.61 (−2.73 to 1.45)

0.56

Secondary outcomes

 Vegetable intake (g/day)

39 (18)

39 (17)

552

−0.3 (−2.6 to 1.9)

0.76

550

−0.4 (−2.6 to 1.9)

0.74

0.5 (−2.3 to 3.4)

0.75

 Fruit/berry intake (g/day)

143 (64)

148 (63)

549

−1.1 (−7.8 to 9.9)

0.81

547

1.2 (−7.8 to 10.2)

0.79

0.1 (−9.1 to 9.2)

0.98

 Sweet drinks (g/day)

74 (87)

71 (78)

547

7.1 (−8.9 to 22.4)

0.37

545

7.2 (−8.7 to 22.4)

0.35

11.1 (−8.8 to 30.5)

0.26

 Screen time (min/day)

127 (62)

126 (63)

552

2.0 (−7.6 to 11.3)

0.68

550

2.5 (−7.1 to 11.7)

0.56

1.3 (−9.8 to 12.2)

0.81

  1. Abbreviations: PSE parental self-efficacy, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, P p-value
  2. 1 Crude linear mixed-effect model adjusted only for baseline value and CHC centre (random intercept). Coefficient can be interpreted as the mean difference between groups at follow-up (intervention – control)
  3. 2 Linear mixed-effect model adjusted for baseline value, CHC centre (random intercept), child age and sex
  4. 3 Imputed analysis was adjusted for baseline value, CHC centre (random intercept), child age and sex. N = 698 (intervention n = 358, control n = 340)
  5. 4 Total score calculated as the sum of all 16 PSE questions (0–10) creating a maximum score of 160