樱花视频

Skip to main content

Table 3 Intervention effect results on parental self-efficacy subscales

From: 鈥楽aga Stories in health talks鈥� for health promotion in Swedish child healthcare: results from a cluster-randomised hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study

听

Descriptive data (n =鈥�544)1

Complete-case analysis2

听

Intervention n =鈥�266

Control n =鈥�288

听
听

mean (SD)

mean (SD)

Coefficient (95% CI)

P

PSE subscales

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

听听

PSE dietary behaviours3

57.1 (7.9)

56.1 (8.3)

57.3 (8.2)

57.1 (7.7)

鈭�0.78 (鈭�1.79 to 0.21)

0.12

PSE physical activity4

24.3 (4.1)

23.8 (4.2)

24.5 (4.0)

24.4 (3.7)

鈭�0.46 (鈭�0.96 to 0.04)

0.070

PSE limit-setting5

42.6 (7.9)

41.8 (7.6)

44.4 (7.9)

42.8 (8.0)

0.17 (鈭�0.83 to 1.16)

0.74

  1. Abbreviations: PSE parental self-efficacy, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, P p-value
  2. 1 Descriptive data for the 544 subjects with complete PSE data at baseline and follow-up, and data for adjusted variables i.e., child age and sex
  3. 2 Linear mixed-effect model adjusted for baseline value, CHC centre (random intercept), child age and sex. Coefficient can be interpreted as the mean difference between groups at follow-up (intervention 鈥� control)
  4. 3 Parental self-efficacy for promoting healthy dietary behaviours in children, assessed with 7 questions (0鈥�10), maximum score 70
  5. 4 Parental self-efficacy for promoting healthy physical activity behaviours in children, assessed with 3 questions (0鈥�10), maximum score 30
  6. 5 Parental self-efficacy for limit-setting of unhealthy dietary or physical activity behaviours in children, assessed with 6 questions (0鈥�10), maximum score 60
Back to article page

樱花视频

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us