Ó£»¨ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the mediation effect analysis

From: The lagged effects of parent–child relationship on internet addiction: parallel mediation of psychological need frustration and self-esteem

Predictor variables

T3 Internet addiction

Ìý

T2 Psychological need frustration

Ìý

T2 Self-esteem

Ìý

T3 Internet addiction

β

95% CI

Ìý

β

95% CI

Ìý

β

95% CI

Ìý

β

95% CI

Age

0.03

[0.01, 0.05]

Ìý

0.01

[− 0.01, 0.03]

Ìý

0.01**

[0.01, 0.02]

Ìý

0.03**

[0.01, 0.05]

Gender

0.01

[− 0.05, 0.07]

Ìý

0.07**

[0.02, 0.13]

Ìý

−0.04**

[− 0.07, − 0.02]

Ìý

−0.02

[− 0.07, 0.04]

T1 Parent–child relationship

−0.20***

[− 0.25, − 0.15]

Ìý

−0.24***

[− 0.29, − 0.20]

Ìý

0.12***

[0.10, 0.15]

Ìý

−0.12***

[− 0.17, − 0.07]

T1 Psychological need frustration

ÌýÌýÌý

0.45***

[0.40, 0.50]

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

T1 Self-esteem

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

0.49***

[0.45, 0.63]

ÌýÌýÌý

T1 Internet addiction

0.45***

[0.42, 0.49]

Ìý

0.07***

[0.04, 0.10]

Ìý

−0.01

[− 0.02, 0.01]

Ìý

0.44***

[0.40, 0.47]

T2 Psychological need frustration

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

0.24***

[0.18, 0.29]

T2 Self-esteem

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

−0.16***

[− 0.25, − 0.07]

R2

0.31

ÌýÌý

0.40

ÌýÌý

0.45

ÌýÌý

0.36

Ìý

F

185.84***

ÌýÌý

276.52***

ÌýÌý

333.53***

ÌýÌý

171.80***

Ìý
  1. Note. N = 2483; Gender (1 = boy, 2 = girl); **p &±ô³Ù; 0.01, ***p &±ô³Ù; 0.001